Lucknow. The results of the Bihar Legislative Assembly elections have also shown a mirror to Uttar Pradesh. This is an appropriate opportunity to peek into the opposition of Uttar Pradesh’s opposition parties. From the opposition’s point of view, the situation in Bihar and UP is more or less the same. Even in Bihar, there was seen some power fighting in the competition in the form of Grand Alliance, but in the context of Uttar Pradesh, is it possible? The Bihar election result has raised this question in front of the opposition. This question is also relevant because despite the issue in front, there is no desire of any opposition party to grab it and take it to the public.
The by-election results are also a mirror for the opposition. The BJP fought with all its strength in this election held for seven seats in the assembly. There were Chief Ministers, Deputy Chief Ministers and other big leaders of the state in the election campaign. This was the reason that the BJP was successful in maintaining the status quo and six of the seven seats came to its account. Whereas in the by-elections held before the Lok Sabha elections, the manner in which the Opposition of the state was seen fighting with enthusiasm and solidarity, this time it lacked. In a way, there was no desire to go in public vigorously.
One seat went to the SP’s account, but it was not enough to boost morale. Apathy to such an extent that even Akhilesh Yadav did not go publicity in all the seats. There was a lack of requisite stubbornness to get a seat in the BSP. The same situation was with Congress. As if his candidates fought for the ritual payment. The Congress had shown its attitude on the Hathras incident, but the manner in which even a proper form could not be filed in Tundla, it explains the situation. This led to the message that much remains to be done to prepare the land.
There is no doubt that opposition is necessary for healthy democracy. Priyanka Vadra looks forward to sitting in Delhi to overcome the Congress’s new hope. Worrying about the strength of the organization as much as they feel comfortable with Delhi, in reality it is not as easy at the ground level. How can issues be explored by sitting in Delhi to surround the government sitting in Lucknow? But Priyanka is doing this work like a bizarre but true. The lack of any plan to connect people to the party is evident. The message of making the state leadership more responsible also came from this by-election. When Annu Tandon left the party, there was also a hint that many more could go.
Of course, the Samajwadi Party shows a stir at some intervals, but Akhilesh Yadav has to understand that nothing will be achieved without getting on the road. Of course, he has a lot of work from metro to Agra Express-Way to count, yet he should take a lesson from his father Mulayam Singh Yadav. Whenever Mulayam found the issue, he grabbed it and did not hesitate from getting on the road to encircling the Raj Bhavan. The point was that he became a symbol of struggle. The SP has become a little stronger than before the arrival of many BSP-Congress leaders. Yet the by-election results indicated that the target would not be achieved without making the organization aggressive.
Now the matter of Bahujan Samaj Party. Mayawati has created the party in such a way that even without her consent, the leaf cannot crack. Whoever dared to dodge, was shown the way out. The condition is that in the presence of Mayawati, the BSP public functionary meeting would hardly have taken place. The party definitely has a base vote, but the by-election results have shocked them a lot. Now the chances of repeating the results like 2007 are hardly seen. However, the party has raised eyeballs on the backward by replacing the state president Munkad Ali on Deepawali and replacing him with Bhima Rajbhar. Then come to the original question.
Leave a Reply