Lucknow. The much awaited decision of the special CBI court came on Wednesday in the Ayodhya demolition case which changed the political direction of the country. Special judge SK Yadav, while delivering the final verdict of his tenure, acquitted all the accused, including LK Advani, Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, Kalyan Singh, on 28 years of trial. The special judge said that no one can be accused from the photographs. The Ayodhya demolition was not pre-planned. There is no strong evidence of the incident. No one can be called guilty just by photographs. The LAU had already stated in its report that there was a possibility of an untoward on December 6, 1992, but it was not investigated.
Special Judge of the CBI Court SK Yadav said in his judgment that stone pelting started at 12 noon on December 6, 1992 from behind the disputed structure in Ayodhya. Ashok Singhal wanted to preserve the structure as the structure contained statues. The kar sevaks were asked to bring water and flowers to keep both hands busy. Jal did not consider the newspapers to be evidence and said that the video cassette scenes are also unclear. Cassettes were not sealed, negative of photos were not introduced. The speech tapes of Ritambra and several other accused were not sealed.
The Ayodhya demolition case is decided by 2300 pages. The decision will be uploaded on the court website shortly. The lawyers of the CBI and the accused have filed a written debate of about eight and a half pages. Apart from this, 351 witnesses were examined by the CBI before the court and presented more than 600 documents.
LIVE Ayodhya Demolition Verdict Update …
After the decision, MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh said that not only me but the whole country is happy with this money. Today’s historic decision has come. I am going directly to Ayodhya to see Ramlala. MP Sakshi Maharaj said: Today is a historic day. I expected Ramlala to win this morning.
On behalf of the Muslim side, Zafaryab Jilani said that this decision is against both the law and the High Court. Those who have been from the Muslim side in the demolition case will be appealed in the High Court.
-2300 page judgment. According to the new provisions of the CrPC after the acquittal, a bail of 50 thousand and a personal bond was filed on behalf of all the 26 present.
While delivering the judgment in the demolition case, Judge SK Yadav said that there is no evidence against VHP leader Ashok Singhal. The incident of dismantling the disputed structure was not pre-planned. This incident happened suddenly.
Special Judge SK Yadav has started reading the verdict. He said the Ayodhya demolition was not pre-planned.
It was an accidental event. Special Judge SK Yadav said that there is no strong evidence of the incident. The judge mentioned Ashok Sinhala several times during this period. He ordered the acquittal of all the accused.
Special Judge SK Yadav is still in his chamber. Action is being taken to fill the bail bond by the convicts of all the accused. After this special judge SK Yadav will reach the court room and read the verdict.
Vinay Rai, Satish Pradhan, Nritya Gopal Das, Sadhvi Ritambra, Uma Bharti, Sudhir Kakkar etc. The accused have come to the court room by preparing their bail forms. There is also a preparation for release on bail immediately in the event of conviction and punishment. Even in the case of acquittal, the accused will have to give bail under Section 437A CRPC.
– All 26 accused except Lal Krishna Advani, Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, Kalyan Singh, Satish Pradhan have come to court. All incoming accused were informed to Special Judge SK Yadav. He will be coming to the court room shortly.
Special Judge SK Yadav sought information about the presence of all the accused through the court. Defense lawyers told the prosecutor that two of the accused were yet to arrive.
– CBI special court has reached about 26 accused in Ayodhya demolition case. Special judge SK Yadav will read the decision in a while.
Ramji Gupta, accused in the court in Ayodhya demolition case, said that the decision will be in our favor. I was involved in the movement from the beginning. If convicted, I am ready to go to jail. The first was my arrest. 49 people entered the same file.
– Sakshi Maharaj’s lawyer Prashant Singh Atal says that the CBI has failed to give evidence. 351 witnesses do not appear to prove the charge. Witness of CBI has not been able to provide proof. The decision will come in our favor only. People had broken the structure with spontaneous inspiration, in which there was no fault of anyone.
– Lal Krishna Advani, Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, Mahant Nritya Gopal Das have not arrived to appear in court, while Sadhvi Ritambhara, Vinay Katiyar, Ram Vilas Vedatis, Dharmadas, Champat Rai, Pawan Paday and Lallu Singh reach Lucknow Have been
Outside the old premises of the High Court in Lucknow, there is a tight security since morning for the decision of the disputed structure demolition case. A decision in this matter is reported at 11 am. In addition to the judges, litigants, defendants and their lawyers, only the court staff can go to the CBI court.
Case was registered on December 6, 1992: The disputed structure was demolished in Ayodhya on 6 December 1992. Both Hindus and Muslims made their claims on this. The Hindu side maintained that the structure in Ayodhya was built by the Mughal ruler Babur at the Sri Ram Janmabhoomi in 1528, while the Muslim side claimed that the mosque was not built by demolishing a temple. On the call of organizations associated with the temple movement, a large number of kar sevaks gathered there and demolished this structure. The first First Information Report (FIR) in this case was lodged at the Ramjanmabhoomi police station on the same day. A case was registered against 40 known and millions of unknown kar sevaks under various sections of the IPC.
Only 32 of the 49 accused survive: On December 6, 1992, a total of 49 FIRs were registered in this case after the disputed structure demolition. CBI had filed a charge sheet against 40 accused after deliberating all together. Charges were framed against nine by filing a supplementary affidavit on 11 January 1996. A total of 32 of the 49 accused are now alive.
Leave a Reply