The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has given a major decision regarding the Income Tax Department. The court has also imposed 7 days jail and a fine of 25000 to Harish Gadwani, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Department, in the case of contempt of court. Where Harish Gadwani will have to surrender in the court by 22 December. After that he will be jailed for 7 days. In such a situation, if the fine is not paid, the officer will have to spend an extra day in jail.
Actually, Advocate Radhika Singh, who is looking into the case, said in an exclusive conversation with TV9 that this order has been given on a contempt petition filed by Prashant Chandra in the bench of Justice Irshad Ali. Radhika Singh says that the Income Tax Department in Lucknow had sent an assessment notice of about Rs 52 lakh for the year 2011-2012, while she had filed her income tax from Delhi. He had filed a petition in the court regarding this.
What is the matter?
At the same time, Radhika Singh said that despite the notice and order given by the court on March 31, 2015, the pending notice on the Income Tax Department’s website continued for 7 months, which hurt her honor a lot. Had happened. With this, the amount of 52 lakhs increased to 90 lakhs, due to which Prashant Chanda did not get any kind of loan from the bank. Nor can anyone use the credit card. Because his civil got spoiled.
Advocate Radhika Singh also said that Prashant Chandra was harassed by Gadwani despite the court’s order. This notice was not removed from the website with the intention of harassing Prashant Chandra.
Prashant Chandra made serious allegations against IT officer
Along with this, TV9 has spoken to senior advocate Prashant Chandra, the victim of the case. His junior lawyer Radhika argued in the court, after which action was taken yesterday. When the victim lawyer Prashant Chandra spoke to TV9, he said that this Income Tax officer used to bother me a lot personally.
IT officer used to demand vehicle- Prashant Chandra
In such a situation, sometimes a vehicle was demanded and sometimes a driver was demanded. Apart from this, many methods were also demanded. When all these things were not completed by me, they sent a false notice on me. When this notice was rejected by the court. Despite that, I have not removed this notice on my website, due to which I am very hurt.